Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 0:42:28 GMT -6
Best Article Two decades of open innovation Add cybersecurity expertise to your boardroom The Internet has played a huge role in promoting knowledge sharing through tools such as wikis and forums. But these tools have their limitations. For example, on controversial topics, wikis can suffer from editorial wars between people with opposing views, and it can be difficult to effectively sift through the vast amount of information posted on the forum, especially since the quality of this information can vary widely. Could there be better internet tools to facilitate.
Collective deliberation on complex issues? This is a question that researchers at MIT and the University of Naples (Italy) have been exploring with the aim of promoting cooperation in the fight against climate change. In September 2016, researchers at the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, the at the University of Naples Federico II, and the School of Engineering at the University of Naples Federico II conducted the Job Function Email List first study of what Klein calls a new Internet-based collaboration platform for field testing. The researchers published a working paper in March, “Can we harness collective intelligence for collaborative deliberation? Their findings are discussed in . The Case for the Climate Change Collaboratory; also authored a related working paper, The MIT Collaboratory: Efficient Large-Scale Deliberation on Complex Issues.
In a Collaboration Hall structure, posts are organized into logical argument diagrams that can be displayed like an outline so that visitors to the online community can more easily identify the main issues related to the topic. Users can also rate ideas and arguments. The theory is that for complex topics like climate change, argument-based structures may be more effective in helping collective intelligence emerge than freer publishing structures such as wikis or forums. The first field tests (involving engineering graduate students from the University of Naples) produced some interesting results. Given the task of conducting collective deliberations.
Collective deliberation on complex issues? This is a question that researchers at MIT and the University of Naples (Italy) have been exploring with the aim of promoting cooperation in the fight against climate change. In September 2016, researchers at the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, the at the University of Naples Federico II, and the School of Engineering at the University of Naples Federico II conducted the Job Function Email List first study of what Klein calls a new Internet-based collaboration platform for field testing. The researchers published a working paper in March, “Can we harness collective intelligence for collaborative deliberation? Their findings are discussed in . The Case for the Climate Change Collaboratory; also authored a related working paper, The MIT Collaboratory: Efficient Large-Scale Deliberation on Complex Issues.
In a Collaboration Hall structure, posts are organized into logical argument diagrams that can be displayed like an outline so that visitors to the online community can more easily identify the main issues related to the topic. Users can also rate ideas and arguments. The theory is that for complex topics like climate change, argument-based structures may be more effective in helping collective intelligence emerge than freer publishing structures such as wikis or forums. The first field tests (involving engineering graduate students from the University of Naples) produced some interesting results. Given the task of conducting collective deliberations.